In Fairfax, VA, an owner and a bookkeeper can face very different outcomes in a Trust Fund Recovery Penalty review because the IRS looks at actual control, not job title alone. Under IRM 5.7.3, the key question is whether each person had status, duty, authority, and willfulness. A bookkeeper who only follows instructions is often in a different position from an owner who decides which creditors get paid.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!Start with who controlled the money decisions
The IRS does not treat every person who touches payroll records as a responsible person. IRM 5.7.3.1.5 explains that responsibility depends on the facts and circumstances, and that significant control means more than signing checks or preparing returns. The IRS also looks for willfulness, which can include knowingly paying other creditors while employment taxes remain unpaid.
For an owner, the issue is often whether the person had the ability to choose which bills to pay, direct deposits, borrow funds, or override payroll decisions. For a bookkeeper, the issue is narrower: did the person merely carry out instructions, or could the person independently decide which creditors got paid? That distinction matters more than a title like controller, office manager, or bookkeeper.
What evidence separates an owner from a ministerial bookkeeper
A helpful decision point is whether the person had independent judgment over financial affairs. IRM 5.7.3.4.2 states that an employee who only pays bills as directed by a superior is generally not responsible, while someone with significant control may be. The IRS may ask for interviews, but the documents should already show who controlled the choices.
Review bank signature cards, internal approvals, payroll instructions, board minutes, loan documents, email directives, and any written limits on the bookkeeper’s authority. If the bookkeeper could not choose which creditors to pay when cash was short, that supports a ministerial role. If the owner routinely directed payment to vendors while payroll taxes went unpaid, that supports responsibility and possible willfulness.
Use payroll and bank records to test the story
The most useful records are the ones that show decision-making over time: payroll journals, Form 941 filings, proof of tax deposits, canceled checks, bank statements, and messages showing who instructed the payments. Also look for loan or cash-flow communications that explain whether funds were available but used elsewhere.
A hypothetical example: if a bookkeeper prepared payroll and signed checks only after the owner told them which bills to pay, the bookkeeper may be able to show a purely clerical role. If the owner, by contrast, decided to pay suppliers and keep the business operating while trust fund taxes stayed unpaid, the owner may fit the IRS responsibility analysis even if someone else handled the paperwork.
What happens if the IRS proposes the penalty
If the IRS concludes a person is responsible, it issues a letter proposing assessment. The person then has a limited time to appeal that proposal; the IRS says the letter explains the appeal rights, and Publication 5 covers the protest process. If no response is filed, the IRS can assess the penalty and send a notice and demand for payment.
This is also where the distinction between the business debt and personal exposure matters. The TFRP is an additional means of collecting trust fund taxes when the company cannot fully pay. It does not erase the business liability, and it does not automatically apply to everyone on the payroll or accounting team.
Questions about An owner and a bookkeeper face different responsibility facts
Does a bookkeeper automatically become personally liable for unpaid payroll taxes?
No. The IRS looks at whether the bookkeeper had independent judgment and significant control over who got paid. A person who only follows instructions and performs ministerial tasks is generally in a different position from someone who decides creditor priorities.
Can an owner avoid the TFRP by blaming the accountant or payroll service?
Not necessarily. The IRS focuses on who had authority and who knew the taxes were unpaid. Outsourcing payroll does not by itself remove responsibility if the owner still controlled the payment decisions or knew other creditors were being paid first.
What records are most useful in a Fairfax TFRP review?
Bank statements, payroll records, Form 941 filings, tax deposit proof, written payment approvals, email instructions, job descriptions, and any documents showing who could choose which creditors to pay. Those records help separate clerical work from actual financial control.
Request a TFRP case review before the facts harden
Schedule an IRS Notice Conference
CALL (469) 262-6525 · TEXT (469) 252-8832
Sources and related resources
Tax.Directory IRS guidance and FAQs · IRSDecoder notice explanations · ETSVideos
Executive Tax Solution resources
Executive Tax Solution · TaxAssassin · MrTaxPlan · TaxFans · TaxDebtCalculator · LocalTaxMasters · TaxProDirectory · TaxSupportServices · TexasITIN · PremierTaxLiens
General educational guidance. Relief and collection protections depend on the actual notices, account history, financial evidence, and applicable law. A consultation does not itself stop enforcement or preserve an appeal deadline.
Discover more from Sachse, Murphy, Wylie Executive Tax Solution (469) 262-6525 - Allen Lenth IRS Tax Consultant
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.