In Agua Dulce, CA, the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty can reach an owner and a bookkeeper differently even if both touched payroll. The IRS looks at each person’s actual authority, what they knew about unpaid trust fund taxes, and whether they chose to pay other creditors instead. A job title, check-signing access, or routine payroll work does not automatically create personal exposure.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!That distinction matters because the IRS does not decide TFRP cases by org chart. Under IRM 5.7.3, responsibility is a facts-and-circumstances question, and willfulness requires more than a mistake. If the record shows one person controlled creditor payments and another only followed directions, the outcome can differ sharply for each individual.
The first practical step is to separate the roles on paper before you answer any IRS contact. Gather bank signature cards, payroll instructions, internal emails, board minutes, ownership records, and any written job descriptions. Those records help show who could independently decide which bills got paid and who merely processed payments as directed. If a bookkeeper only handled ministerial tasks, that fact can matter under IRM 5.7.3.4.2. If an owner directed other bills to be paid while payroll taxes stayed unpaid, that fact can point the other way.
A key limit is that the IRS may ask for an interview to map out duties and authority, but the interview should be used to test the facts, not to assume both people are equally liable. For example, a hypothetical bookkeeper who signs checks only when told which vendor to pay and who must ask the owner when funds are short is different from an owner who decides whether payroll taxes or suppliers get paid first. The first person may have a ministerial role; the second may have significant control.
You should also keep the business account and the personal exposure question separate. The business can owe the employment tax even if the IRS decides not to assess the TFRP against one individual. And if the IRS proposes the penalty, it can then pursue personal collection tools against an assessed responsible person. That is why it is important not to assume that a company-level payroll problem automatically becomes the same personal case for everyone involved.
Before you respond, build a timeline: when deposits were missed, when each person learned about the arrears, who approved payments to other creditors, and who had the ability to change those decisions. That timeline often tells the story better than a title or an email signature. If you already received a proposed assessment letter, review the notice carefully and prepare the facts that support each person’s separate role. Under IRM 5.7.3, each recommendation stands on its own merits.
The most useful next step is a case review focused on the actual decision-making chain, the books, and the payroll records. That is the fastest way to identify whether the owner, the bookkeeper, or both should be treated as potentially responsible persons under the IRS standards.
Why the IRS may treat the owner and bookkeeper differently
Under IRM 5.7.3, responsibility depends on status, duty, authority, and the facts of the case. The IRS asks whether a person had significant control over the business’s finances, not just a title or mechanical access to the books.
An owner often has broader authority, but ownership alone is not the only issue. A non-owner can still be responsible if that person controlled which creditors were paid, had meaningful financial discretion, and knew payroll taxes were unpaid.
Records that help show real authority or limited authority
Useful records include bank signature cards, canceled checks, payroll registers, return-preparation records, internal instructions, and communications about which bills were paid. If there were company policies limiting the bookkeeper’s authority, those records matter.
Also look for evidence of who met with the lender, who chose vendors, who approved payroll timing, and who knew about the missed deposits. Those facts help distinguish a ministerial role from independent financial control.
How willfulness is evaluated for each person
The IRS generally looks for a knowing or plainly indifferent decision to let other creditors get paid while trust fund taxes remained unpaid. Using available funds for other creditors when employment taxes cannot be paid is a warning sign.
That said, willfulness is separate from responsibility. A person who lacked real authority to choose payments may not meet the TFRP standard even if they handled payroll tasks. The IRS must analyze each person separately.
What to do before answering an IRS proposal
Build a timeline, collect the payroll and banking records, and compare each person’s actual duties with the IRS description of responsibility. Do not rely on titles alone, and do not assume a notice to one person decides the other person’s case.
If the IRS has already sent a proposed assessment letter, respond with facts, not just conclusions. A case review can help clarify whether the owner, the bookkeeper, or only one of them fits the TFRP rules based on the record.
Questions about An owner and a bookkeeper face different responsibility facts
Does a bookkeeper automatically become personally liable for payroll taxes?
No. Under IRM 5.7.3, a bookkeeper is not automatically responsible just because they process checks or prepare payroll. The IRS looks for independent judgment and significant control over which creditors were paid.
Can an owner be responsible even if the bookkeeper handled payroll?
Yes. If the owner controlled payment decisions, knew the taxes were unpaid, and chose to pay other creditors, the IRS may view that owner as a responsible person. The facts control, not the division of clerical tasks.
What records matter most in an owner-versus-bookkeeper TFRP case?
The most useful records are bank authority documents, payroll records, written instructions, emails about bill payment, and documents showing who made financial decisions. Those records help show whether someone had ministerial duties or real control.
Request a focused TFRP case review
Schedule an IRS Notice Conference
CALL (469) 262-6525 · TEXT (469) 252-8832
Sources and related resources
Tax.Directory IRS guidance and FAQs · IRSDecoder notice explanations · ETSVideos
Executive Tax Solution resources
Executive Tax Solution · TaxAssassin · MrTaxPlan · TaxFans · TaxDebtCalculator · LocalTaxMasters · TaxProDirectory · TaxSupportServices · TexasITIN · PremierTaxLiens
General educational guidance. Relief and collection protections depend on the actual notices, account history, financial evidence, and applicable law. A consultation does not itself stop enforcement or preserve an appeal deadline.
Discover more from Sachse, Murphy, Wylie Executive Tax Solution (469) 262-6525 - Allen Lenth IRS Tax Consultant
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.