In Charleston, SC, a joint bank account can still be reached by an IRS levy even when another person put in the money. The important question is not just who deposited the funds, but whether the taxpayer had an unrestricted right to withdraw them. Under IRM 5.11.4 and 5.11.2, that withdrawal right can make the account subject to levy, while the non-liable owner may need to pursue a wrongful levy claim for their share.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!Why a joint account can be levied
The IRS does not treat every joint account as protected simply because someone else contributed the funds. IRM 5.11.4 explains that a levy served on a bank attaches to funds in an account where the taxpayer has an unrestricted right to withdraw money, even if other people also have access and even if another person made all the deposits.
That means the bank may honor the levy up to the amount stated in the notice if the taxpayer’s withdrawal rights are broad enough. The levy reaches the amount on deposit when the bank receives it, not later deposits made after service. A levy is not the same thing as a lien, and a levy on a bank account is not the same as a release of the underlying debt.
What records matter most in Charleston
If another person claims the funds are theirs, the best evidence is practical account documentation, not a quick explanation. Useful records can include the signature card, account agreement, online banking authority, deposit history, cancelled checks, transfer records, and any written agreement showing how the parties intended to use the account.
It also helps to separate whose money was deposited from who could withdraw it. That distinction matters because the IRS guidance allows the bank to send the funds if the taxpayer had unrestricted access, even when the third party can prove the deposits came from them. If the account is frozen or the levy is pending during the 21-day holding period, that time may be used to gather proof and ask the bank to hold the funds while ownership is reviewed.
How a non-liable owner can respond
IRM 5.11.4 says a non-liable third party may seek return of wrongfully levied funds through an administrative wrongful levy claim under IRC 6343(b) or a suit under IRC 7426(a)(1). That is the appropriate path when the money belongs to someone other than the taxpayer and the taxpayer had no right to it.
Do not assume that filing a claim is automatic relief. The issue is fact-specific, and the IRS may still look to whether the taxpayer had signature authority or another enforceable right to the money. If the facts suggest the account is being targeted incorrectly, the next practical step is to assemble ownership records before the bank forwards the funds at the end of the holding period. If the levy appears to violate law or IRS procedure, IRM 5.11.2 also notes that erroneous levies must be addressed differently from routine collection action.
A practical next step before the holding period ends
The most useful move is a short, document-led review. Compare the account agreement, deposits, and withdrawal authority against the levy notice. If the taxpayer is only a nominal co-owner, but not the person with actual control, that distinction should be shown with records. If the taxpayer truly had unrestricted access, the account may still be exposed even though the money came from someone else.
In Charleston, county records may help with unrelated ownership questions, but the levy dispute itself is a federal collection matter. If you need to talk through the notice, review the paperwork, or prepare a wrongful levy response, ask for a case review or IRS notice conference before the bank’s surrender date passes. That discussion can help identify whether the issue is ownership, timing, or another collection alternative.
Questions about A joint bank account contains another person’s money
Does a joint bank account automatically belong to both people for IRS levy purposes?
No. The IRS guidance focuses on whether the taxpayer had an unrestricted right to withdraw the funds. A joint title alone does not resolve the issue, and a third party may still need to prove ownership through records.
Can the bank release the money before the 21-day holding period ends?
By law, banks generally wait 21 calendar days after service before surrendering funds, subject to extension or waiver. During that time, the levy may be released or the amount owed may change, so records should be gathered quickly.
What if the other person can prove all the deposits were theirs?
That helps, but it may not be enough by itself if the taxpayer also had unrestricted withdrawal rights. IRM 5.11.4 says the non-liable owner may need to pursue a wrongful levy claim or a court action to seek return of the funds.
Request a Levy Review Before Funds Are Sent
Schedule an IRS Notice Conference
CALL (469) 262-6525 · TEXT (469) 252-8832
Sources and related resources
Tax.Directory IRS guidance and FAQs · IRSDecoder notice explanations · ETSVideos
Executive Tax Solution resources
Executive Tax Solution · TaxAssassin · MrTaxPlan · TaxFans · TaxDebtCalculator · LocalTaxMasters · TaxProDirectory · TaxSupportServices · TexasITIN · PremierTaxLiens
General educational guidance. Relief and collection protections depend on the actual notices, account history, financial evidence, and applicable law. A consultation does not itself stop enforcement or preserve an appeal deadline.
Discover more from Sachse, Murphy, Wylie Executive Tax Solution (469) 262-6525 - Allen Lenth IRS Tax Consultant
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.